Warning: file_get_contents(/home/www/settings/mirror_forum_db_enable_sql): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/content/Forum/functions.php on line 8
That's where you are totally fucking ignorant. Australia is caught between a rock and a hard place. There is nothing better that China could do to entrench Australia into further sucking up to the US. The current government won by not being MAGA. But it is a precarious position and we have to exist. If we can't buy from the Chinese like under normal conditions we will be forced to buy from the US, who are even happier to screw us. I do think they should do more to shut of gas to China if China continues to fuck us over diesel.
Wait, the conditions are not normal? How come?
You don't have to be MAGA to be a US bootlicker. See Starmer. Or the mirror.
Hey, you could just ignite another trade war with China. MAGA would approve. ð
That's where you are totally fucking ignorant. Australia is caught between a rock and a hard place. There is nothing better that China could do to entrench Australia into further sucking up to the US. The current government won by not being MAGA. But it is a precarious position and we have to exist. If we can't buy from the Chinese like under normal conditions we will be forced to buy from the US, who are even happier to screw us. I do think they should do more to shut of gas to China if China continues to fuck us over diesel.
Yeah, China was happy to work with Australia to provide refined products and is happy to keep getting liquified natural gas at lower cost than you can buy it in Australia, but is also happy to leave Australia in the lurch
Yeah, China was happy to work with Australia to provide refined products and is happy to keep getting liquified natural gas at lower cost than you can buy it in Australia, but is also happy to leave Australia in the lurch
For many Western analysts, Chinaâs response to the Iran crisis seems to confirm a familiar verdict: Beijing is an unreliable friend. It buys Iranian oil, denounces unilateral military action, calls for restraintâand then stops short of doing what they believe a great power should do for a partner under pressure: come to its aid militarily, either directly or through supplying arms and funding.
It is certainly true that China is not willing to play the same role for Iran that the United States has long assumed for its own partners. But that does not mean that China is feckless, nor does it mean that its ties with Iran are insincere. It means, above all, that too many observers still measure every rising power against a U.S. template.
In Washington, power is still read through the grammar of alliances, security guarantees, and the conversion of political relationships into military obligations. Once that template is assumed to be universal, any refusal to act as a military patron becomes evidence of weakness. Yet Beijing has never organized power quite that wayâand the reasons are not reducible to a single cynical calculation. (...)
