The Dragons' Roost
- triskele - Jun 23, 2024 - 10:51am
NY Times Strands
- Proclivities - Jun 23, 2024 - 10:26am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Jun 23, 2024 - 10:24am
Israel
- R_P - Jun 23, 2024 - 10:23am
NYTimes Connections
- maryte - Jun 23, 2024 - 10:05am
Wordle - daily game
- maryte - Jun 23, 2024 - 9:50am
How do you create optimism?
- R_P - Jun 23, 2024 - 9:20am
BEATLES Make History AGAIN!!
- thisbody - Jun 23, 2024 - 9:12am
TV shows you watch
- R_P - Jun 23, 2024 - 8:57am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jun 23, 2024 - 8:36am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Red_Dragon - Jun 23, 2024 - 8:27am
Things You Thought Today
- islander - Jun 23, 2024 - 8:17am
Congress
- R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 5:53pm
Prog Rockers Anonymous
- thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:34pm
Song of the Day
- thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:32pm
What do you snack on?
- thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:20pm
Joe Biden
- R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 2:44pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Jun 22, 2024 - 2:44pm
What did you have for dinner?
- triskele - Jun 22, 2024 - 2:31pm
Jam! (why should a song stop)
- thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 1:53pm
June 2024 Photo Theme - Eyes
- fractalv - Jun 22, 2024 - 1:46pm
Things I Saw Today...
- R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 1:38pm
Trump
- kcar - Jun 22, 2024 - 12:41pm
Some bands or songs are recurring too much in Rock channe...
- mlebihan29 - Jun 22, 2024 - 9:26am
Fox Spews
- R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 9:19am
Sonos
- thatslongformud - Jun 22, 2024 - 6:18am
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Jun 22, 2024 - 4:44am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- thisbody - Jun 21, 2024 - 4:26pm
Too much classic rock lately?
- thisbody - Jun 21, 2024 - 4:01pm
Girls Just Want to Have Fun
- oldviolin - Jun 21, 2024 - 2:22pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jun 21, 2024 - 12:26pm
2024 Elections!
- R_P - Jun 21, 2024 - 12:20pm
Electronic Music
- Manbird - Jun 21, 2024 - 12:14pm
LeftWingNutZ
- Steely_D - Jun 21, 2024 - 8:07am
The Obituary Page
- ColdMiser - Jun 21, 2024 - 7:56am
RightWingNutZ
- Red_Dragon - Jun 20, 2024 - 6:39pm
Basketball
- GeneP59 - Jun 20, 2024 - 4:53pm
Gotta Get Your Drink On
- Antigone - Jun 20, 2024 - 4:04pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jun 20, 2024 - 2:10pm
Shall We Dance?
- Steely_D - Jun 20, 2024 - 1:18pm
Predictions
- oldviolin - Jun 20, 2024 - 11:18am
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone
- oldviolin - Jun 20, 2024 - 11:10am
Ukraine
- R_P - Jun 20, 2024 - 10:41am
Just Wrong
- ColdMiser - Jun 20, 2024 - 7:43am
Pink Floyd Set?
- Coaxial - Jun 20, 2024 - 5:46am
Whatever happened to Taco Wagon?
- Coaxial - Jun 19, 2024 - 6:14pm
favorite love songs
- oldviolin - Jun 19, 2024 - 3:09pm
Outstanding Covers
- pope183 - Jun 19, 2024 - 2:50pm
Climate Change
- R_P - Jun 19, 2024 - 12:34pm
SCOTUS
- ColdMiser - Jun 19, 2024 - 7:15am
20+ year listeners?
- islander - Jun 18, 2024 - 7:41pm
Baseball, anyone?
- rgio - Jun 18, 2024 - 5:02pm
Other Medical Stuff
- miamizsun - Jun 18, 2024 - 2:35pm
Hello from Greece!
- miamizsun - Jun 18, 2024 - 2:35pm
Europe
- R_P - Jun 18, 2024 - 9:33am
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 16, 2024 - 8:57pm
What Did You See Today?
- Manbird - Jun 16, 2024 - 2:39pm
Geomorphology
- kurtster - Jun 16, 2024 - 1:29pm
Artificial Intelligence
- thisbody - Jun 16, 2024 - 10:53am
The Chomsky / Zinn Reader
- thisbody - Jun 16, 2024 - 10:42am
Football, soccer, futbol, calcio...
- thisbody - Jun 16, 2024 - 8:35am
No stream after station ID
- arlen.nelson969 - Jun 15, 2024 - 2:29pm
Business as Usual
- kurtster - Jun 15, 2024 - 9:53am
What Makes You Laugh?
- Antigone - Jun 14, 2024 - 7:04pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Jun 14, 2024 - 3:15pm
China
- R_P - Jun 14, 2024 - 2:59pm
what the hell, miamizsun?
- oldviolin - Jun 14, 2024 - 2:08pm
Religion
- Steely_D - Jun 14, 2024 - 1:28pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Jun 14, 2024 - 8:56am
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- Proclivities - Jun 14, 2024 - 6:42am
Florida
- R_P - Jun 13, 2024 - 3:35pm
Democratic Party
- thisbody - Jun 13, 2024 - 9:08am
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- thisbody - Jun 13, 2024 - 8:56am
Animal Resistance
- thisbody - Jun 13, 2024 - 8:04am
New Music
- lievendegrauwe - Jun 13, 2024 - 12:43am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Amazing Civil War Photos
|
Page: 1, 2 Next |
meower
Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe Gender:
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 11, 2011 - 1:30pm |
|
cc_rider wrote: damn fine read! thanks for that!
|
|
meower
Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 11, 2011 - 1:04pm |
|
aflanigan wrote:I was listening to the radio this weekend and a commenter was describing Matthew Brady's photographic exploits during the Civil War. She claimed that one of Brady's proteges faked photos by bringing a dead body to battlefield sites and posing it. She said the giveaway is when you see a rifle next to a corpse wearing boots/shoes; neither of these valuable items would have been abandoned on the field. The famous photo below is generally conceded to have been staged
(for example, the rifle in the photo is not one a Confederate sharpshooter would have used) i heard the same report. interesting.
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 11, 2011 - 12:34pm |
|
aflanigan wrote:I was listening to the radio this weekend and a commenter was describing Matthew Brady's photographic exploits during the Civil War. She claimed that one of Brady's proteges faked photos by bringing a dead body to battlefield sites and posing it.
Mainstream media manipulating photos? That's crazy talk. I don't doubt some of the photos were staged. Others seem just too gruesome to be posed, but who knows. Reporters and photographers of the period did not always adhere to the highest standards of journalistic integrity, like they do now.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 11, 2011 - 12:19pm |
|
DaveInVA wrote: I was listening to the radio this weekend and a commenter was describing Matthew Brady's photographic exploits during the Civil War. She claimed that one of Brady's proteges faked photos by bringing a dead body to battlefield sites and posing it. She said the giveaway is when you see a rifle next to a corpse wearing boots/shoes; neither of these valuable items would have been abandoned on the field. The famous photo below is generally conceded to have been staged
(for example, the rifle in the photo is not one a Confederate sharpshooter would have used)
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 10, 2011 - 6:37pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:Seward was Lincoln's SecState and neither of them had any notion of abolishing slavery at the outset of the war. Thru acts such as what are detailed in the article, emancipation was inevitable; he and Lincoln only recognized that years later. It sounded to me like —nevermind the war— he realized and was a bit ashamed that he'd been willfully ignoring the obvious wrongs of slavery in order to maintain some political stance.
Neither ignored the evils of slavery, but Lincoln at least publicly dissembled about it, adopting a wishy-washy stance that belied what he believed. Seward was chiding Lincoln for compromising those beliefs in an attempt to appease southern factions that might have broken with the Confederacy so long as they could keep their slaves. Anti-slavery sentiment was the unifying factor in the north, the real motivator for the troops. Lincoln's failure to endorse that cause early on was seen in many quarters (by Fredrick Douglass especially) as a betrayal.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 10, 2011 - 5:52pm |
|
miamizsun wrote:Not many knew, but Lyle Lovett actually fought for the south. Justine says "chorff gots his frisky on!"
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 10, 2011 - 5:44pm |
|
Not many knew, but Lyle Lovett actually fought for the south.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 10, 2011 - 5:26pm |
|
winter wrote:Sounds to me like what Seward was saying was that the Confederates never had a hope of winning - that they may as well have saved themselves and the rest of the country a lot of blood and tragedy if they'd just accepted the need for change and worked to make it happen instead of clinging to a dying tradition. Seward was Lincoln's SecState and neither of them had any notion of abolishing slavery at the outset of the war. Thru acts such as what are detailed in the article, emancipation was inevitable; he and Lincoln only recognized that years later. It sounded to me like —nevermind the war— he realized and was a bit ashamed that he'd been willfully ignoring the obvious wrongs of slavery in order to maintain some political stance.
|
|
winter
Location: in exile, as always Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 10, 2011 - 4:15pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: Thanks, I read this twice yesterday. Kind of an aside, I really liked the last few lines: - When Lincoln finally unveiled the Emancipation Proclamation in the fall of 1862, he framed it in Butleresque terms, not as a humanitarian gesture but as a stratagem of war.On the September day of Lincoln’s edict, a Union colonel ran into William Seward, the president’s canny secretary of state, on the street in Washington and took the opportunity to congratulate him on the administration’s epochal act.
- Seward snorted. “Yes,” he said, “we have let off a puff of wind over an accomplished fact.”
- “What do you mean, Mr. Seward?” the officer asked.
- “I mean,” the secretary replied, “that the Emancipation Proclamation was uttered in the first gun fired at Sumter, and we have been the last to hear it.”
=========== Makes me wonder how things would have turned out if Seward had been elected president at some point.
Sounds to me like what Seward was saying was that the Confederates never had a hope of winning - that they may as well have saved themselves and the rest of the country a lot of blood and tragedy if they'd just accepted the need for change and worked to make it happen instead of clinging to a dying tradition.
|
|
meower
Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 10, 2011 - 3:48pm |
|
hippiechick wrote:We have been watching the extremely long and interesting Ken Burns documentary The Civil War. What a horrid war that was. When we will stop killing each other?
i never killed you. wha??
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 10, 2011 - 3:37pm |
|
We have been watching the extremely long and interesting Ken Burns documentary The Civil War. What a horrid war that was. When we will stop killing each other?
|
|
DaveInSaoMiguel
Location: No longer in a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 10, 2011 - 3:20pm |
|
Antigone wrote:A small group of re-enactors at the historic house down the block. Cool, They had a 3 day encampment at the Nauseum of the Confederacy grounds behind my house this weekend. I should have taken pics. They are packing up to leave now...
|
|
Antigone
Location: A house, in a Virginian Valley Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 10, 2011 - 3:02pm |
|
A small group of re-enactors at the historic house down the block.
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 5, 2011 - 8:47am |
|
cc_rider wrote: An interesting article. Enslaved people weren't treated much better than the way we treat cattle these days, which makes me seriously think about how badly we still treat animals.
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 5, 2011 - 8:03am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:Middle East or Iowa, too. I'm gonna repost that speech. Take THAT, homophobes! Thanks.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 5, 2011 - 7:55am |
|
cc_rider wrote: Love that line. It seems appropriate to some of the changes in the Middle East, you know? The 'ruling class' seems to be the last to hear the message from the street. Our own Administration included... Middle East or Iowa, too.
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 5, 2011 - 7:48am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:Thanks, I read this twice yesterday. Kind of an aside, I really liked the last few lines: - When Lincoln finally unveiled the Emancipation Proclamation in the fall of 1862, he framed it in Butleresque terms, not as a humanitarian gesture but as a stratagem of war.On the September day of Lincoln’s edict, a Union colonel ran into William Seward, the president’s canny secretary of state, on the street in Washington and took the opportunity to congratulate him on the administration’s epochal act.
- Seward snorted. “Yes,” he said, “we have let off a puff of wind over an accomplished fact.”
- “What do you mean, Mr. Seward?” the officer asked.
- “I mean,” the secretary replied, “that the Emancipation Proclamation was uttered in the first gun fired at Sumter, and we have been the last to hear it.”
=========== Makes me wonder how things would have turned out if Seward had been elected president at some point Love that line. It seems appropriate to some of the changes in the Middle East, you know? The 'ruling class' seems to be the last to hear the message from the street. Our own Administration included... I've gotta make time to sit down and read the whole thing again. Important history.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 5, 2011 - 7:37am |
|
cc_rider wrote: Thanks, I read this twice yesterday. Kind of an aside, I really liked the last few lines: - When Lincoln finally unveiled the Emancipation Proclamation in the fall of 1862, he framed it in Butleresque terms, not as a humanitarian gesture but as a stratagem of war.On the September day of Lincoln’s edict, a Union colonel ran into William Seward, the president’s canny secretary of state, on the street in Washington and took the opportunity to congratulate him on the administration’s epochal act.
- Seward snorted. “Yes,” he said, “we have let off a puff of wind over an accomplished fact.”
- “What do you mean, Mr. Seward?” the officer asked.
- “I mean,” the secretary replied, “that the Emancipation Proclamation was uttered in the first gun fired at Sumter, and we have been the last to hear it.”
=========== Makes me wonder how things would have turned out if Seward had been elected president at some point.
|
|
Antigone
Location: A house, in a Virginian Valley Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 5, 2011 - 7:05am |
|
An interesting article in the Washington Post about a new exhibit of rare photographs at the Library of Congress.
|
|
|