[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - miamizsun - May 19, 2025 - 5:08pm
 
Joe Biden - kurtster - May 19, 2025 - 5:02pm
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - May 19, 2025 - 3:04pm
 
Musky Mythology - ScottFromWyoming - May 19, 2025 - 2:28pm
 
merchandise? - dischuckin - May 19, 2025 - 1:25pm
 
Recycle Bin - ScottFromWyoming - May 19, 2025 - 1:21pm
 
NYTimes Connections - geoff_morphini - May 19, 2025 - 12:38pm
 
NY Times Strands - geoff_morphini - May 19, 2025 - 12:25pm
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - May 19, 2025 - 12:20pm
 
Israel - R_P - May 19, 2025 - 12:07pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - black321 - May 19, 2025 - 11:44am
 
Crazy conspiracy theories - R_P - May 19, 2025 - 11:40am
 
Breaking News - GeneP59 - May 19, 2025 - 9:11am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - May 19, 2025 - 9:08am
 
May 2025 Photo Theme - Action - fractalv - May 19, 2025 - 8:57am
 
Republican Party - ColdMiser - May 19, 2025 - 8:09am
 
USA! USA! USA! - ColdMiser - May 19, 2025 - 8:05am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - ColdMiser - May 19, 2025 - 7:59am
 
Immigration - Red_Dragon - May 19, 2025 - 7:59am
 
Economix - islander - May 19, 2025 - 7:06am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - speedydave.agnew - May 18, 2025 - 8:57pm
 
Artificial Intelligence - R_P - May 18, 2025 - 3:09pm
 
Name My Band - Isabeau - May 18, 2025 - 1:39pm
 
Democratic Party - Isabeau - May 18, 2025 - 1:28pm
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - May 18, 2025 - 11:31am
 
New President Music - Steely_D - May 18, 2025 - 10:30am
 
Beers are Dying - islander - May 18, 2025 - 10:24am
 
Earthquake - geoff_morphini - May 18, 2025 - 9:06am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 17, 2025 - 10:13pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - May 17, 2025 - 1:05pm
 
Fascism In America - kurtster - May 17, 2025 - 9:23am
 
Things You Thought Today - Proclivities - May 17, 2025 - 7:11am
 
China - R_P - May 16, 2025 - 9:12pm
 
Global Warming - geoff_morphini - May 16, 2025 - 8:04pm
 
M.A.G.A. - geoff_morphini - May 16, 2025 - 7:46pm
 
How does skip work, and how can I know I'm listening to t... - sgt0pimienta - May 16, 2025 - 5:59pm
 
What the hell OV? - Isabeau - May 16, 2025 - 5:13pm
 
SCOTUS - islander - May 16, 2025 - 2:23pm
 
Propaganda - R_P - May 16, 2025 - 1:01pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Proclivities - May 16, 2025 - 12:43pm
 
What makes you smile? - GeneP59 - May 16, 2025 - 9:16am
 
How's the weather? - GeneP59 - May 16, 2025 - 8:50am
 
My Favorites - Export and/or stream link? - KickingUpDust - May 15, 2025 - 7:19pm
 
Things I Saw Today... - Red_Dragon - May 15, 2025 - 4:19pm
 
Who is singing? - miamizsun - May 15, 2025 - 4:13am
 
::Animal Kingdom:: - GeneP59 - May 14, 2025 - 5:25pm
 
Bruce Springsteen interview and clips of concert - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2025 - 3:39pm
 
Europe - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2025 - 3:32pm
 
BUG: My Favourites Mix not Playing in MQA Quality on Blue... - NRJCL5 - May 14, 2025 - 3:18pm
 
BLOCKING SONGS - ptooey - May 14, 2025 - 2:32pm
 
The Obituary Page - miamizsun - May 14, 2025 - 6:12am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - May 13, 2025 - 6:32pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - May 13, 2025 - 4:09pm
 
::Famous Birthdays:: - Isabeau - May 13, 2025 - 3:54pm
 
Favorite Quotes - R_P - May 13, 2025 - 12:37pm
 
Anti-War - R_P - May 13, 2025 - 11:57am
 
Media Matters - Red_Dragon - May 12, 2025 - 6:29pm
 
Album recommendation for fans of pop music - Steely_D - May 12, 2025 - 4:59pm
 
Framed - movie guessing game - Steely_D - May 12, 2025 - 10:20am
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - islander - May 12, 2025 - 8:07am
 
No TuneIn Stream Lately - rgio - May 12, 2025 - 5:46am
 
New Music - miamizsun - May 12, 2025 - 3:47am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - winter - May 11, 2025 - 8:41pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - May 11, 2025 - 5:58pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - May 11, 2025 - 11:03am
 
Real Time with Bill Maher - R_P - May 10, 2025 - 12:21pm
 
No Rock Mix on Alexa? - epsteel - May 10, 2025 - 9:45am
 
Kodi Addon - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 10, 2025 - 9:19am
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 9, 2025 - 9:34pm
 
Basketball - GeneP59 - May 9, 2025 - 4:58pm
 
Pink Floyd - miamizsun - May 9, 2025 - 3:52pm
 
Freedom of speech? - R_P - May 9, 2025 - 2:19pm
 
Questions. - kurtster - May 8, 2025 - 11:56pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - May 8, 2025 - 7:27pm
 
Save NPR and PBS - SIGN THE PETITION - R_P - May 8, 2025 - 3:32pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » The War On You Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 75, 76, 77  Next
Post to this Topic
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 8, 2013 - 8:25am

 pigtail wrote:

ANOTHER EXMILITARY NUTBAG WITH A RAMBO FETISH

 
You think wearing cammie gear in downtown LA was a giveaway?



pigtail

pigtail Avatar

Location: Southern California
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 8, 2013 - 8:23am


ANOTHER EXMILITARY NUTBAG WITH A RAMBO FETISH
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 6, 2013 - 11:47am

 bokey wrote:

We have to pray or whatever for the health of the Supreme Court Justices that are in their late 70's and hope they are strong enough to hang on for 4 years for the good of the country.

 
I am looking forward to Obama appointing at least one new justice.
Manbird

Manbird Avatar

Location: La Villa Toscana
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 6, 2013 - 11:25am

  
 

N O T I C E
 

Please deposit your waistcoat 
in the proper container -SRPD 512a 

 




sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 2:35pm

Don't waive your rights with your flags.  Sage Francis
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 10:25am

 kurtster wrote:

Some of us have been talking about this stuff for a long time already until we were blue in the face.

This what the next 4 years is about, stopping this (and lots more) before it goes any further.

Our current POTUS thinks he has a mandate to keep advancing this.  

Are you ready to fight the good fight yet ?

 
We have to pray or whatever for the health of the Supreme Court Justices that are in their late 70's and hope they are strong enough to hang on for 4 years for the good of the country.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 9:34am

 hippiechick wrote:

I am extremely disappointed in this memo. The good part is that it is being exposed. I'm really glad that someone (Michael Issakoff) has taken this on. It's about time we shined a light on this.

 
Some of us have been talking about this stuff for a long time already until we were blue in the face.

This what the next 4 years is about, stopping this (and lots more) before it goes any further.

Our current POTUS thinks he has a mandate to keep advancing this. 

Are you ready to fight the good fight yet ?
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 6:57am

Just filed my taxes, yes there is most definitely a war on me that has been declared by the Federal government.{#Sad}{#Frustrated}
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 6:48am

 kurtster wrote:
miamizsun wrote:
'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.

EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans

A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.

The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the  September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. 



Thought it worthy of reposting here ...

Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention.

Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things.

Peace



 
I am extremely disappointed in this memo. The good part is that it is being exposed. I'm really glad that someone (Michael Issakoff) has taken this on. It's about time we shined a light on this.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 6:42am

miamizsun wrote:
'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.

EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans

A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.

The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the  September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. 



Thought it worthy of reposting here ...

Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention.

Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things.

Peace




hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 11, 2013 - 6:46am

 miamizsun wrote:
is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge)

U.S. Cities Relying on Precog Software to Predict Murder

 

Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you?

New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision.

The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia.

Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future.



 
How often does science fiction become fiction?

As long as they don't use the wooden balls, so stupid. 
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2013 - 6:44am

is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge)

U.S. Cities Relying on Precog Software to Predict Murder

 

Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you?

New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision.

The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia.

Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 6:06am

 Zep wrote:
Renditions continue under Obama.

The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators.

U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.

. . . . . .

But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok? 
 



 
Obama ? 

Isn't he the guy that hunts down American citizens, ignoring the Constitution and due process and kills them with drones ?
Zep

Zep Avatar

Location: Funkytown


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:52am

Renditions continue under Obama.

The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators.

U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.

. . . . . .

But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok? 
 


bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:32am

 kurtster wrote:
 Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.

Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid.   I am just aware.   A huge difference.

I'll grant you one thing however.   What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong.   Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.

EdIt:  If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.

 
We live in a country where our choices for President  were Mitt Romney(who I do not care for) or re-elect a child murderer.

Our country picked the child murderer.

 That is when I realized my life is basically over.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:27am

 helenofjoy wrote:

The anger that comes across in many of your posts.  Not just this conversation.  To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.

 

I took your comment, which was obviously directed at me, as a direct charge that I was living a life filled with fear which directly affects all of my thinking and limits my ability to reason properly.  Now that is constructive ?  I think that is more of an attack to be used to dismiss all of my thinking regardless of merit.

Calling something worn out is tantamount to a personal attack now ?

As you wish ...


helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:19am

 kurtster wrote:


My reply to you was filled with vitriol ?
 ( Not this particular reply, no. )

and what anger ?

{#Ask}

 
The anger that comes across in many of your posts.  Not just this conversation.  To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:04am

 helenofjoy wrote:

Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are.  It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche.  Your fear is obvious in your anger.  If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol.  You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone.  If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.

 

My reply to you was filled with vitriol ?

and what anger ?

{#Ask}


helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 4:58am

 kurtster wrote:

That cliché is so worn out.  I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it.

What is the first step in problem solving ?  Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.

Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid.  I am just aware.  A huge difference.

I'll grant you one thing however.  What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong.  Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.
 
Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are.  It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche.  Your fear is obvious in your anger.  If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol.  You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone.  If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 4:49am

 helenofjoy wrote:
I think it must be horrible to live a life every day filled with fear-based, negative thinking.  It leaves no room for creative, positive problem solving.  

 
That cliché is so worn out.  I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it.

What is the first step in problem solving ?  Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.

Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid.  I am just aware.  A huge difference.

I'll grant you one thing however.  What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong.  Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.

EdIt:  If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 75, 76, 77  Next