Trump
- Red_Dragon - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:51pm
Things You Thought Today
- ScottFromWyoming - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:49pm
Define Reality
- Isabeau - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:49pm
Live Music
- Isabeau - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:45pm
FOUR WORDS
- oldviolin - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:27pm
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group
- rgio - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:21pm
THREE WORDS
- triskele - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:47pm
TWO WORDS
- triskele - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:46pm
ONE WORD
- triskele - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:45pm
2024 Elections!
- ScottFromWyoming - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:43pm
Kamala Harris
- Steely_D - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:30pm
Periodic wake up call
- billdock1 - Oct 14, 2024 - 12:32pm
NASA & other news from space
- Beaker - Oct 14, 2024 - 10:28am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Oct 14, 2024 - 10:22am
NYTimes Connections
- Bill_J - Oct 14, 2024 - 7:59am
NY Times Strands
- ptooey - Oct 14, 2024 - 7:41am
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Oct 14, 2024 - 6:57am
Wordle - daily game
- ptooey - Oct 14, 2024 - 6:49am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Oct 14, 2024 - 6:23am
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - Oct 14, 2024 - 6:19am
Coffee
- Coaxial - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:26am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:20am
Earthquake
- miamizsun - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:39am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- simon.maasz770 - Oct 14, 2024 - 2:05am
Top Secret America
- thisbody - Oct 13, 2024 - 3:09pm
MIXES
- R_P - Oct 13, 2024 - 2:54pm
Rock Movies/Documentaries
- thisbody - Oct 13, 2024 - 12:35pm
Rolling Stones
- thisbody - Oct 13, 2024 - 12:12pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Oct 13, 2024 - 12:10pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - Oct 13, 2024 - 11:49am
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc.
- thisbody - Oct 13, 2024 - 10:58am
Baseball, anyone?
- GeneP59 - Oct 12, 2024 - 7:31pm
Two Things
- GeneP59 - Oct 12, 2024 - 7:18pm
What Did You See Today?
- GeneP59 - Oct 12, 2024 - 7:16pm
Graham Nash
- buddy - Oct 12, 2024 - 2:23pm
David Crosby
- buddy - Oct 12, 2024 - 2:10pm
Israel
- R_P - Oct 12, 2024 - 2:05pm
Neil Young
- buddy - Oct 12, 2024 - 2:02pm
Stills
- buddy - Oct 12, 2024 - 1:58pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Oct 12, 2024 - 1:21pm
What the hell OV?
- miamizsun - Oct 12, 2024 - 1:10pm
Sweet horrible irony.
- kurtster - Oct 12, 2024 - 1:01pm
New Music
- R_P - Oct 12, 2024 - 12:30pm
The Black Keys
- sirdroseph - Oct 12, 2024 - 4:34am
Masculinists?
- sirdroseph - Oct 12, 2024 - 4:14am
LeftWingNutZ
- sirdroseph - Oct 12, 2024 - 4:09am
October 2024 Photo Theme - Furry
- haresfur - Oct 12, 2024 - 3:44am
It's the economy stupid.
- Th1nk1ngTh1ng - Oct 11, 2024 - 5:04pm
Art Show
- haresfur - Oct 11, 2024 - 4:06pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- thisbody - Oct 11, 2024 - 1:47pm
Aurora Borealis
- thisbody - Oct 11, 2024 - 1:41pm
NEED A COMPUTER GEEK!
- islander - Oct 11, 2024 - 11:12am
what else do you listen to? (RP alternatives)
- turningcosmos - Oct 11, 2024 - 10:41am
Great guitar faces
- thisbody - Oct 11, 2024 - 9:01am
Culture: Where Will the Elite Eat, Meet & Greet?
- thisbody - Oct 11, 2024 - 8:36am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Oct 11, 2024 - 7:50am
How's the weather?
- Coaxial - Oct 11, 2024 - 7:40am
Favorite Quotes
- Isabeau - Oct 11, 2024 - 7:17am
Feminism: Catch the (Third?) Wave!
- sirdroseph - Oct 11, 2024 - 3:57am
Overpopulation
- Red_Dragon - Oct 10, 2024 - 9:26pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- buddy - Oct 10, 2024 - 3:38pm
Buddy's Haven
- buddy - Oct 10, 2024 - 12:24pm
Climate Change
- R_P - Oct 10, 2024 - 11:25am
Signs o' the Apocalypse in the news...
- oldviolin - Oct 10, 2024 - 10:17am
Comics!
- Proclivities - Oct 10, 2024 - 8:52am
RADIO 2050
- oldviolin - Oct 10, 2024 - 7:08am
What makes you smile?
- Steely_D - Oct 10, 2024 - 6:32am
Naim bit rate
- rgio - Oct 10, 2024 - 6:00am
YouTube: Music-Videos
- R_P - Oct 9, 2024 - 5:51pm
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today...
- oldviolin - Oct 9, 2024 - 2:26pm
charity link
- oldviolin - Oct 9, 2024 - 2:23pm
Questions.
- Steely_D - Oct 9, 2024 - 8:11am
Song progress in web version
- bodelange - Oct 9, 2024 - 7:09am
iOS app see full title
- bodelange - Oct 9, 2024 - 7:06am
France
- FreeWanda - Oct 9, 2024 - 5:34am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
The War On You
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... , 75, 76, 77 Next |
bokey
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 8, 2013 - 8:25am |
|
pigtail wrote:ANOTHER EXMILITARY NUTBAG WITH A RAMBO FETISH You think wearing cammie gear in downtown LA was a giveaway?
|
|
pigtail
Location: Southern California Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 8, 2013 - 8:23am |
|
ANOTHER EXMILITARY NUTBAG WITH A RAMBO FETISH
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 - 11:47am |
|
bokey wrote: We have to pray or whatever for the health of the Supreme Court Justices that are in their late 70's and hope they are strong enough to hang on for 4 years for the good of the country.
I am looking forward to Obama appointing at least one new justice.
|
|
Manbird
Location: La Villa Toscana Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 - 11:25am |
|
N O T I C E Please deposit your waistcoat in the proper container -SRPD 512a
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 2:35pm |
|
Don't waive your rights with your flags. Sage Francis
|
|
bokey
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 10:25am |
|
kurtster wrote: Some of us have been talking about this stuff for a long time already until we were blue in the face.
This what the next 4 years is about, stopping this (and lots more) before it goes any further.
Our current POTUS thinks he has a mandate to keep advancing this.
Are you ready to fight the good fight yet ?
We have to pray or whatever for the health of the Supreme Court Justices that are in their late 70's and hope they are strong enough to hang on for 4 years for the good of the country.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 9:34am |
|
hippiechick wrote: I am extremely disappointed in this memo. The good part is that it is being exposed. I'm really glad that someone (Michael Issakoff) has taken this on. It's about time we shined a light on this.
Some of us have been talking about this stuff for a long time already until we were blue in the face. This what the next 4 years is about, stopping this (and lots more) before it goes any further. Our current POTUS thinks he has a mandate to keep advancing this. Are you ready to fight the good fight yet ?
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 6:57am |
|
Just filed my taxes, yes there is most definitely a war on me that has been declared by the Federal government.
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 6:48am |
|
kurtster wrote:miamizsun wrote:'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law. EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on AmericansBy Michael Isikoff National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S. The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. Thought it worthy of reposting here ... Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention. Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things. Peace I am extremely disappointed in this memo. The good part is that it is being exposed. I'm really glad that someone (Michael Issakoff) has taken this on. It's about time we shined a light on this.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 - 6:42am |
|
miamizsun wrote:'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law. EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on AmericansBy Michael Isikoff National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S. The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. Thought it worthy of reposting here ... Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention. Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things. Peace
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 11, 2013 - 6:46am |
|
miamizsun wrote:is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge) Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you? New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision. The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia. Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future. How often does science fiction become fiction? As long as they don't use the wooden balls, so stupid.
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 11, 2013 - 6:44am |
|
is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge) Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you? New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision. The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia. Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 6:06am |
|
Zep wrote:Renditions continue under Obama.The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators. U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.
. . . . . .
But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok? Obama ? Isn't he the guy that hunts down American citizens, ignoring the Constitution and due process and kills them with drones ?
|
|
Zep
Location: Funkytown
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:52am |
|
Renditions continue under Obama.The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators. U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.
. . . . . .
But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok?
|
|
bokey
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:32am |
|
kurtster wrote: Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.
Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid. I am just aware. A huge difference.
I'll grant you one thing however. What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong. Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.
EdIt: If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.
We live in a country where our choices for President were Mitt Romney(who I do not care for) or re-elect a child murderer. Our country picked the child murderer. That is when I realized my life is basically over.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:27am |
|
helenofjoy wrote: The anger that comes across in many of your posts. Not just this conversation. To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.
I took your comment, which was obviously directed at me, as a direct charge that I was living a life filled with fear which directly affects all of my thinking and limits my ability to reason properly. Now that is constructive ? I think that is more of an attack to be used to dismiss all of my thinking regardless of merit. Calling something worn out is tantamount to a personal attack now ? As you wish ...
|
|
helenofjoy
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:19am |
|
kurtster wrote:My reply to you was filled with vitriol ? ( Not this particular reply, no. ) and what anger ? The anger that comes across in many of your posts. Not just this conversation. To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 5:04am |
|
helenofjoy wrote: Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are. It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche. Your fear is obvious in your anger. If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol. You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone. If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.
My reply to you was filled with vitriol ? and what anger ?
|
|
helenofjoy
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 4:58am |
|
kurtster wrote: That cliché is so worn out. I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it.
What is the first step in problem solving ? Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.
Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid. I am just aware. A huge difference.
I'll grant you one thing however. What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong. Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.
Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are. It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche. Your fear is obvious in your anger. If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol. You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone. If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 - 4:49am |
|
helenofjoy wrote:I think it must be horrible to live a life every day filled with fear-based, negative thinking. It leaves no room for creative, positive problem solving.
That cliché is so worn out. I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it. What is the first step in problem solving ? Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem. Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid. I am just aware. A huge difference. I'll grant you one thing however. What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong. Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'. EdIt: If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.
|
|
|