[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Trump - Red_Dragon - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:51pm
 
Things You Thought Today - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:49pm
 
Define Reality - Isabeau - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:49pm
 
Live Music - Isabeau - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:45pm
 
FOUR WORDS - oldviolin - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:27pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - rgio - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:21pm
 
THREE WORDS - triskele - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:47pm
 
TWO WORDS - triskele - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:46pm
 
ONE WORD - triskele - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:45pm
 
2024 Elections! - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:43pm
 
Kamala Harris - Steely_D - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:30pm
 
Periodic wake up call - billdock1 - Oct 14, 2024 - 12:32pm
 
NASA & other news from space - Beaker - Oct 14, 2024 - 10:28am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Oct 14, 2024 - 10:22am
 
NYTimes Connections - Bill_J - Oct 14, 2024 - 7:59am
 
NY Times Strands - ptooey - Oct 14, 2024 - 7:41am
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Oct 14, 2024 - 6:57am
 
Wordle - daily game - ptooey - Oct 14, 2024 - 6:49am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Oct 14, 2024 - 6:23am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2024 - 6:19am
 
Coffee - Coaxial - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:26am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Oct 14, 2024 - 5:20am
 
Earthquake - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2024 - 4:39am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - simon.maasz770 - Oct 14, 2024 - 2:05am
 
Top Secret America - thisbody - Oct 13, 2024 - 3:09pm
 
MIXES - R_P - Oct 13, 2024 - 2:54pm
 
Rock Movies/Documentaries - thisbody - Oct 13, 2024 - 12:35pm
 
Rolling Stones - thisbody - Oct 13, 2024 - 12:12pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Oct 13, 2024 - 12:10pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Oct 13, 2024 - 11:49am
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - thisbody - Oct 13, 2024 - 10:58am
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Oct 12, 2024 - 7:31pm
 
Two Things - GeneP59 - Oct 12, 2024 - 7:18pm
 
What Did You See Today? - GeneP59 - Oct 12, 2024 - 7:16pm
 
Graham Nash - buddy - Oct 12, 2024 - 2:23pm
 
David Crosby - buddy - Oct 12, 2024 - 2:10pm
 
Israel - R_P - Oct 12, 2024 - 2:05pm
 
Neil Young - buddy - Oct 12, 2024 - 2:02pm
 
Stills - buddy - Oct 12, 2024 - 1:58pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Oct 12, 2024 - 1:21pm
 
What the hell OV? - miamizsun - Oct 12, 2024 - 1:10pm
 
Sweet horrible irony. - kurtster - Oct 12, 2024 - 1:01pm
 
New Music - R_P - Oct 12, 2024 - 12:30pm
 
The Black Keys - sirdroseph - Oct 12, 2024 - 4:34am
 
Masculinists? - sirdroseph - Oct 12, 2024 - 4:14am
 
LeftWingNutZ - sirdroseph - Oct 12, 2024 - 4:09am
 
October 2024 Photo Theme - Furry - haresfur - Oct 12, 2024 - 3:44am
 
It's the economy stupid. - Th1nk1ngTh1ng - Oct 11, 2024 - 5:04pm
 
Art Show - haresfur - Oct 11, 2024 - 4:06pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - thisbody - Oct 11, 2024 - 1:47pm
 
Aurora Borealis - thisbody - Oct 11, 2024 - 1:41pm
 
NEED A COMPUTER GEEK! - islander - Oct 11, 2024 - 11:12am
 
what else do you listen to? (RP alternatives) - turningcosmos - Oct 11, 2024 - 10:41am
 
Great guitar faces - thisbody - Oct 11, 2024 - 9:01am
 
Culture: Where Will the Elite Eat, Meet & Greet? - thisbody - Oct 11, 2024 - 8:36am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Oct 11, 2024 - 7:50am
 
How's the weather? - Coaxial - Oct 11, 2024 - 7:40am
 
Favorite Quotes - Isabeau - Oct 11, 2024 - 7:17am
 
Feminism: Catch the (Third?) Wave! - sirdroseph - Oct 11, 2024 - 3:57am
 
Overpopulation - Red_Dragon - Oct 10, 2024 - 9:26pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - buddy - Oct 10, 2024 - 3:38pm
 
Buddy's Haven - buddy - Oct 10, 2024 - 12:24pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Oct 10, 2024 - 11:25am
 
Signs o' the Apocalypse in the news... - oldviolin - Oct 10, 2024 - 10:17am
 
Comics! - Proclivities - Oct 10, 2024 - 8:52am
 
RADIO 2050 - oldviolin - Oct 10, 2024 - 7:08am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Oct 10, 2024 - 6:32am
 
Naim bit rate - rgio - Oct 10, 2024 - 6:00am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - R_P - Oct 9, 2024 - 5:51pm
 
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today... - oldviolin - Oct 9, 2024 - 2:26pm
 
charity link - oldviolin - Oct 9, 2024 - 2:23pm
 
Questions. - Steely_D - Oct 9, 2024 - 8:11am
 
Song progress in web version - bodelange - Oct 9, 2024 - 7:09am
 
iOS app see full title - bodelange - Oct 9, 2024 - 7:06am
 
France - FreeWanda - Oct 9, 2024 - 5:34am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » The War On You Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 75, 76, 77  Next
Post to this Topic
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 8, 2013 - 8:25am

 pigtail wrote:

ANOTHER EXMILITARY NUTBAG WITH A RAMBO FETISH

 
You think wearing cammie gear in downtown LA was a giveaway?



pigtail

pigtail Avatar

Location: Southern California
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 8, 2013 - 8:23am


ANOTHER EXMILITARY NUTBAG WITH A RAMBO FETISH
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 6, 2013 - 11:47am

 bokey wrote:

We have to pray or whatever for the health of the Supreme Court Justices that are in their late 70's and hope they are strong enough to hang on for 4 years for the good of the country.

 
I am looking forward to Obama appointing at least one new justice.
Manbird

Manbird Avatar

Location: La Villa Toscana
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 6, 2013 - 11:25am

  
 

N O T I C E
 

Please deposit your waistcoat 
in the proper container -SRPD 512a 

 




sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 2:35pm

Don't waive your rights with your flags.  Sage Francis
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 10:25am

 kurtster wrote:

Some of us have been talking about this stuff for a long time already until we were blue in the face.

This what the next 4 years is about, stopping this (and lots more) before it goes any further.

Our current POTUS thinks he has a mandate to keep advancing this.  

Are you ready to fight the good fight yet ?

 
We have to pray or whatever for the health of the Supreme Court Justices that are in their late 70's and hope they are strong enough to hang on for 4 years for the good of the country.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 9:34am

 hippiechick wrote:

I am extremely disappointed in this memo. The good part is that it is being exposed. I'm really glad that someone (Michael Issakoff) has taken this on. It's about time we shined a light on this.

 
Some of us have been talking about this stuff for a long time already until we were blue in the face.

This what the next 4 years is about, stopping this (and lots more) before it goes any further.

Our current POTUS thinks he has a mandate to keep advancing this. 

Are you ready to fight the good fight yet ?
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 6:57am

Just filed my taxes, yes there is most definitely a war on me that has been declared by the Federal government.{#Sad}{#Frustrated}
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 6:48am

 kurtster wrote:
miamizsun wrote:
'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.

EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans

A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.

The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the  September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. 



Thought it worthy of reposting here ...

Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention.

Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things.

Peace



 
I am extremely disappointed in this memo. The good part is that it is being exposed. I'm really glad that someone (Michael Issakoff) has taken this on. It's about time we shined a light on this.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 6:42am

miamizsun wrote:
'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.

EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans

A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.

The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the  September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. 



Thought it worthy of reposting here ...

Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention.

Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things.

Peace




hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 11, 2013 - 6:46am

 miamizsun wrote:
is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge)

U.S. Cities Relying on Precog Software to Predict Murder

 

Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you?

New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision.

The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia.

Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future.



 
How often does science fiction become fiction?

As long as they don't use the wooden balls, so stupid. 
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2013 - 6:44am

is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge)

U.S. Cities Relying on Precog Software to Predict Murder

 

Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you?

New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision.

The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia.

Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 6:06am

 Zep wrote:
Renditions continue under Obama.

The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators.

U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.

. . . . . .

But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok? 
 



 
Obama ? 

Isn't he the guy that hunts down American citizens, ignoring the Constitution and due process and kills them with drones ?
Zep

Zep Avatar

Location: Funkytown


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:52am

Renditions continue under Obama.

The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators.

U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.

. . . . . .

But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok? 
 


bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:32am

 kurtster wrote:
 Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.

Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid.   I am just aware.   A huge difference.

I'll grant you one thing however.   What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong.   Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.

EdIt:  If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.

 
We live in a country where our choices for President  were Mitt Romney(who I do not care for) or re-elect a child murderer.

Our country picked the child murderer.

 That is when I realized my life is basically over.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:27am

 helenofjoy wrote:

The anger that comes across in many of your posts.  Not just this conversation.  To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.

 

I took your comment, which was obviously directed at me, as a direct charge that I was living a life filled with fear which directly affects all of my thinking and limits my ability to reason properly.  Now that is constructive ?  I think that is more of an attack to be used to dismiss all of my thinking regardless of merit.

Calling something worn out is tantamount to a personal attack now ?

As you wish ...


helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:19am

 kurtster wrote:


My reply to you was filled with vitriol ?
 ( Not this particular reply, no. )

and what anger ?

{#Ask}

 
The anger that comes across in many of your posts.  Not just this conversation.  To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:04am

 helenofjoy wrote:

Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are.  It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche.  Your fear is obvious in your anger.  If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol.  You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone.  If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.

 

My reply to you was filled with vitriol ?

and what anger ?

{#Ask}


helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 4:58am

 kurtster wrote:

That cliché is so worn out.  I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it.

What is the first step in problem solving ?  Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.

Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid.  I am just aware.  A huge difference.

I'll grant you one thing however.  What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong.  Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.
 
Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are.  It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche.  Your fear is obvious in your anger.  If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol.  You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone.  If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 4:49am

 helenofjoy wrote:
I think it must be horrible to live a life every day filled with fear-based, negative thinking.  It leaves no room for creative, positive problem solving.  

 
That cliché is so worn out.  I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it.

What is the first step in problem solving ?  Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.

Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid.  I am just aware.  A huge difference.

I'll grant you one thing however.  What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong.  Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.

EdIt:  If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 75, 76, 77  Next