[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]
The Rolling Stones — Let It Bleed
Album: Let It Bleed
Avg rating:
7.5

Your rating:
Total ratings: 2259









Released: 1969
Length: 5:22
Plays (last 30 days): 0
share tweet wikiwebsitesearchamg
cd
mp3
search
Well we all need someone to lean on
And if you want it, well you can lean on me
Well, we all need someone we can lean on
And if you want it, well you can lean on me

She said my breasts they will always be open
Baby, you can rest your weary head on me
And there will always be a space in my parking lot
When you need a little coke and sympathy

Yeah, we all need someone we can dream on
And if you want it, well you can dream on me
Yeah, we all need someone we can cream on
And if you want to, well you can cream on me

I was dreaming of a steel guitar engagement
When you drink my health in scented jasmine tea
You knifed me in my dirty filthy basement
With that jaded faded junky nurse
Oh, what pleasant company

We all need someone we can feed on
And if you want it, well you can feed on me
Take my arm, take my leg
Oh, baby, don't you take my head

We all need someone we can bleed on
And if you want it, baby, well you can bleed on me
We all need someone we can bleed on
And if you want it, why don't you bleed on me

Get it on, rider
Get it on, rider
Get it on, rider
You can bleed all over me.
Comments (207)add comment
One can say, and Me, I never became warm with them, they got it. And it goes on.
Posted 4 months ago by Pitjes    [ Reply ]
Hi BillG - you know I love what you and the fam do.  And everyone knows I love the Stones. 
but can we please get some (?all) Hackney Diamonds soon?
MM
Posted 11 months ago by Montreal_Mort    [ Reply ]
Ian Stewart’s piano is absolutely devine.
Posted 1 year ago by jay_nathanson    [ Reply ]
 Antiikk wrote:

Hello. I am from Russia and yes, in Russia, they also listen to American rock. American rock - top.




Dobroe Utrol! (Good Morning)  Kak Dela? (How are you?)
Posted 1 year ago by joejennings    [ Reply ]
 coloradojohn wrote:

For me, Some Girls will always be their best album, but I can certainly hear and appreciate why elder Stones fans revere and worship this...




For me, there is "no BEST Stones album"!  ...Some Good, Some GREAT, Some Mediocre, Some bad!  ...But, one heck of a large selection to choose from!  ...The BEST part is the diversity!    ...nobody can claim that all Stones albums & tunes sound the same!!   ...and, one heck of a long career!!!
  
Posted 1 year ago by joejennings    [ Reply ]
Perhaps the only Rush song that does not grate on my brain and it’s not even theirs…
Posted 2 years ago by SpamNRice    [ Reply ]
For me, Some Girls will always be their best album, but I can certainly hear and appreciate why elder Stones fans revere and worship this...
Posted 2 years ago by coloradojohn    [ Reply ]
 Antiikk wrote:

Hello. I am from Russia and yes, in Russia, they also listen to American rock. American rock - top.




Dobroe Utrol!  Welcome to British Rock & Roll!  And American Radio!
Posted 3 years ago by eileenomurphy    [ Reply ]
 lizardking wrote:

And in the middle he says "Yeah, we all need someone we can cream on, And if you want to, well you can cream on me"

I have a feeling I know what he's singing about.....this one's a 9 to me....great album too....Long Live RP!!

Hence the cream cake on the cover. 
Posted 3 years ago by sbosque    [ Reply ]
R I P  Charlie
will forever miss your beat keeping
Posted 3 years ago by B4D3neaker3    [ Reply ]
RIP Charlie Watts
Posted 3 years ago by eyke    [ Reply ]
 Antiikk wrote:

Hello. I am from Russia and yes, in Russia, they also listen to American rock. American rock - top.



But the Mighty Rolling Stones are English! 
Posted 3 years ago by tonyjory    [ Reply ]
That cake on the cover was prepared by (a then unknown) Delia Smith!
Posted 3 years ago by shinyjim    [ Reply ]
my goodness
we all need more lyrics like this

"She said my breasts they will always be open
Baby, you can rest your weary head on me
And there will always be a space in my parking lot
When you need a little coke and sympathy"

Posted 3 years ago by idiot_wind    [ Reply ]
maybe their best
Posted 3 years ago by idiot_wind    [ Reply ]
In general not a huge Stones fan, but this tune is just outstanding.
Posted 3 years ago by jeff_b_hsv    [ Reply ]
 Antiikk wrote:
Hello. I am from Russia and yes, in Russia, they also listen to American rock. American rock - top.
 
... and Brit and Canadian and Swedish and ... I think so!)
Posted 3 years ago by sunnyS    [ Reply ]
One of my favorite albums. I wore through the grooves on my original vinyl copy. I've repurchased this album a number of times since.
Posted 3 years ago by bitbanger    [ Reply ]
Initially recorded March 9, 1969 - 
Finished June 10, 1969 -
Released on the album LET IT BLEED, December 5, 1969 - the day before ALTAMONT

Lead Vocals: Mick Jagger
Acoustic & Slide Guitar: Keith Richards
Autoharp: Bill Wyman
Piano: Ian Stewart
Bass: Bill Wyman
Drums: Charlie Watts 

Posted 3 years ago by sfyi2001    [ Reply ]
 Antiikk wrote:
Hello. I am from Russia and yes, in Russia, they also listen to American rock. American rock - top.
 
What? The Stones aren't Canadian?! Damn!
Posted 4 years ago by On_The_Beach    [ Reply ]
My first two albums were Let It Bleed and Abbey Road.  Both albums 100% killer and 0% filler
Posted 4 years ago by Edweirdo    [ Reply ]
Great 33.3 cover art.
Posted 4 years ago by iloveradio    [ Reply ]
One of those albums you can listen to over and over. Great stuff.
Posted 4 years ago by iloveradio    [ Reply ]
Ian Stewart's piano performance could be the best part of this great song.
Posted 4 years ago by curtlichter    [ Reply ]
Very few songs by the Stones rank below at least a "7" , so that puts them in very elite company indeed, Zep?,  Beatles?....
Posted 4 years ago by neptunejeff    [ Reply ]
 1wolfy wrote:
 I must agree..this song sounds like it was put together in about 5 minutes..done in 1 take   msymmes wrote:

Oh oh.  Not these guys again?  Sucko Barfo.
 

 

 
Yeah, but it still has KR on guitar.  All is good.  
Posted 4 years ago by xkolibuul    [ Reply ]
 lizardking wrote:

And in the middle he says "Yeah, we all need someone we can cream on, And if you want to, well you can cream on me"

I have a feeling I know what he's singing about.....this one's a 9 to me....great album too....Long Live RP!!
 
Just needed a word to rhyme with dream
Posted 4 years ago by SmackDaddy    [ Reply ]
 justin4kick wrote:
I can't get over the phoney accent
 
How many years has this been bugging you? Phony accents are the warp and woof of rock singing, haven't you noticed?
Posted 4 years ago by bam23    [ Reply ]
Last recordings by Brian Jones and first by Mick Taylor. Major transforming album
Posted 5 years ago by ToddyWoddy    [ Reply ]
 ertefer wrote:
In the end jagger screams out : bleed on rider you can come all over me... 
One of the best songs of the stones i d say
 
 
And in the middle he says "Yeah, we all need someone we can cream on, And if you want to, well you can cream on me"

I have a feeling I know what he's singing about.....this one's a 9 to me....great album too....Long Live RP!!
Posted 5 years ago by lizardking    [ Reply ]
{#Devil_pimp}arguably their best album, zesty none the less and yes I have had this argument with folks for many years let the debate continue and let the album play. my fav is beggars banquet also very zesty!
Posted 5 years ago by primm    [ Reply ]
Hello. I am from Russia and yes, in Russia, they also listen to American rock. American rock - top.
Posted 5 years ago by Antiikk    [ Reply ]
I think it's the drumming that rescues this song. Charlie Watts manages to make you feel like he's pushing the band along throughout the track.
Posted 5 years ago by mattenuttall    [ Reply ]
I can't get over the phoney accent
Posted 5 years ago by justin4kick    [ Reply ]
Old, but gold!
Posted 6 years ago by timelapser    [ Reply ]
Life Changing  (in a positive way  : )
Posted 6 years ago by hayduke2    [ Reply ]
And how many people do you know dream about a steel guitar engagement? 
Posted 6 years ago by idiot_wind    [ Reply ]
 Jota wrote:
A 4, would be double that if Mick didn't put on that stupid voice.

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt9q-WChfeM
Posted 6 years ago by h8rhater    [ Reply ]
 NickDanger wrote:
This. Entire. Album. Rocks!
 
Absolootlee!
Posted 7 years ago by On_The_Beach    [ Reply ]
This. Entire. Album. Rocks!
Posted 7 years ago by NickDanger    [ Reply ]
A 4, would be double that if Mick didn't put on that stupid voice.
Posted 7 years ago by Jota    [ Reply ]
7.3? To quote Kathleen Edwards, "You gotta be fucking kidding me".
Posted 7 years ago by bstevens1951    [ Reply ]
Ian Stewart bangin' some mean ivories...

R.I.P., Stew.
Posted 8 years ago by treatment_bound    [ Reply ]
 I must agree..this song sounds like it was put together in about 5 minutes..done in 1 take   msymmes wrote:

Oh oh.  Not these guys again?  Sucko Barfo.
 

 

Posted 8 years ago by 1wolfy    [ Reply ]
I will be singing this all day... Nice.
Posted 8 years ago by Wilfrue    [ Reply ]
WOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
Posted 8 years ago by hayduke2    [ Reply ]
In the end jagger screams out : bleed on rider you can come all over me... 
One of the best songs of the stones i d say
 
Posted 9 years ago by ertefer    [ Reply ]
saw "Crossfire Hurricane" the other day and it was really great:
Crossfire Hurricane is a 2012 documentary film about The Rolling Stones written and directed by Brett Morgen. The film chronicles the early years of the band through their gradual mainstream acceptance in 1981. The film is a series of interviews conducted without cameras, while showing various points of interest that the band is discussing as archival footage.

 Crossfire Hurricane.jpg
Posted 9 years ago by hayduke2    [ Reply ]
 Sweet_Virginia wrote:
Conspiracy theorists believe that unsupportable esoteric nonsense is the basis of reality. And I tend to agree...
 
Shame on you. If you actually did some research for yourself you would find the reverse is usually true. But if you are comfortable letting your government tell you what to think then I guess there is no point in me mentioning that. 

:) 
Posted 9 years ago by SquiddlyDiddly    [ Reply ]
Another great album from the Stones… 8^)
Posted 9 years ago by dirtbagpook    [ Reply ]

Oh oh.  Not these guys again?  Sucko Barfo.
 
Posted 10 years ago by msymmes    [ Reply ]

 

Donna the Buffalo - Let it Bleed - 1-28-2011, Greensboro, NC (at the Blind Tiger) - Video: DaBabe ("video webcast" archive quality) - audio: Joel at jamlivedotorg - dub/youtube: Rand at herd.tv.

 


Posted 10 years ago by calypsus_1    [ Reply ]
{#Bananapiano}{#Bananapiano}{#Bananapiano}
Posted 10 years ago by Peter_Bradshaw    [ Reply ]
 rdo wrote:

I do appreciate analytical writing, but so much of what you get from academic writers is esoteric, unsopportable nonsense.  It is a shame.  There is so much you can write about art by just taking it at face value. You don't need to resort to creepy, psuedo-Freudian banality.  I'll bet you have a masters in art?

 
Conspiracy theorists believe that unsupportable esoteric nonsense is the basis of reality. And I tend to agree...

One of the greatest stones songs ever!
Posted 10 years ago by Sweet_Virginia    [ Reply ]
 ScottN wrote:

And Gimme Shelter is best anti-war/apocalypse song ever.  And maybe the Stones' best song of all time.  Let it Bleed is very good too.

 

Gimme Shelter is best anti-war/apocalypse song ever  
No, just one of them.  I can list 20 tracks that are just as potent. 
Posted 10 years ago by kingart    [ Reply ]
 thais wrote:

On 1966 Mick sings (and complains):

...
Anyway, I think "Let it Bleed" marks the end of a circle (yes, I know it is a math/geometric nonsense, but it a metaphor) which starts on
"repression" (old ways) and ends on "liberation" (new ways).
....
 
And Gimme Shelter is best anti-war/apocalypse song ever.  And maybe the Stones' best song of all time.  Let it Bleed is very good too.
Posted 10 years ago by ScottN    [ Reply ]

This bloody song is marvelous...  love this whole bloody album...
 
Posted 11 years ago by Lazarus    [ Reply ]
 thais wrote:

On 1966 Mick sings (and complains):

"and I'm tryin' to make some girl
who tells me a baby better come back a maybe next week
'cause you see I'm on losing streak.
I can't get no, oh no no no."

On 1969 Mick sings (and does not complain):

"Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, and if you want it, baby, well you can bleed on me
Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, yeah, and if you want it, baby, why don'cha bleed on me"

Is there a "blood pact" link?
I mean: on 66 all this poor boy could get was go back to home (or pub) with "no satisfaction"; on 69 it did not matter anymore and the "river" could flow without restriction...
Gross? (well, since 50% folks would yell YES, but 50% would keep mouth shut... Well, well, it is a matter for another place and hoour, isn´t it?).
Anyway, I think "Let it Bleed" marks the end of a circle (yes, I know it is a math/geometric nonsense, but it a metaphor) which starts on
"repression" (old ways) and ends on "liberation" (new ways).
(And if those three years was a time when the world (the old world of our granparents) was "ruining, burning, being broked for these hairy and dirty boys", I think it is not a simple coincidence.)
I mean, this song is the end of "teenage years" of RS: their next albuns (Sticky Fingers and Exile on Main Street) is much more "adults", musical and  lyrically. 
So, before the 66 dilemma, now this poor bay decides to accept the terms for obtain his "satisfaction" (in this case, of course, Mick is among those 50% who remains in silent agreement...)

This is why I think this music is superb: it brings an answer to a very difficult question: to grow up or not to grow up.
Is this the right answer?

Hey, it is just a music...
And for music (and art) any answer is better no answer at all.



  Nah, I think it was more like this...Coolest Movie Quotes - Jackie Brown - YouTube 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wldtlQ3LfyI



Posted 11 years ago by Jelani    [ Reply ]
rocking with my self in this sunny afternoon... and it goes from an 8 to a 10! {#Sunny}{#Dancingbanana_2}
Posted 11 years ago by lambret    [ Reply ]

Everybody in my church loves this bloody song...
 
Posted 11 years ago by Lazarus    [ Reply ]
 thais wrote:

On 1966 Mick sings (and complains):

"and I'm tryin' to make some girl
who tells me a baby better come back a maybe next week
'cause you see I'm on losing streak.
I can't get no, oh no no no."

On 1969 Mick sings (and does not complain):

"Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, and if you want it, baby, well you can bleed on me
Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, yeah, and if you want it, baby, why don'cha bleed on me"

Is there a "blood pact" link?
I mean: on 66 all this poor boy could get was go back to home (or pub) with "no satisfaction"; on 69 it did not matter anymore and the "river" could flow without restriction...
Gross? (well, since 50% folks would yell YES, but 50% would keep mouth shut... Well, well, it is a matter for another place and hoour, isn´t it?).
Anyway, I think "Let it Bleed" marks the end of a circle (yes, I know it is a math/geometric nonsense, but it a metaphor) which starts on
"repression" (old ways) and ends on "liberation" (new ways).
(And if those three years was a time when the world (the old world of our granparents) was "ruining, burning, being broked for these hairy and dirty boys", I think it is not a simple coincidence.)
I mean, this song is the end of "teenage years" of RS: their next albuns (Sticky Fingers and Exile on Main Street) is much more "adults", musical and  lyrically. 
So, before the 66 dilemma, now this poor bay decides to accept the terms for obtain his "satisfaction" (in this case, of course, Mick is among those 50% who remains in silent agreement...)

This is why I think this music is superb: it brings an answer to a very difficult question: to grow up or not to grow up.
Is this the right answer?

Hey, it is just a music...
And for music (and art) any answer is better no answer at all.
 
I do appreciate analytical writing, but so much of what you get from academic writers is esoteric, unsopportable nonsense.  It is a shame.  There is so much you can write about art by just taking it at face value. You don't need to resort to creepy, psuedo-Freudian banality.  I'll bet you have a masters in art?
Posted 11 years ago by rdo    [ Reply ]
 gypsyman wrote:

Dog pile. WTF ARE you talking about?
 
{#Lol}
Posted 11 years ago by d-don    [ Reply ]
 thais wrote:

On 1966 Mick sings (and complains):

"and I'm tryin' to make some girl
who tells me a baby better come back a maybe next week
'cause you see I'm on losing streak.
I can't get no, oh no no no."

On 1969 Mick sings (and does not complain):

"Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, and if you want it, baby, well you can bleed on me
Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, yeah, and if you want it, baby, why don'cha bleed on me"

Is there a "blood pact" link?
I mean: on 66 all this poor boy could get was go back to home (or pub) with "no satisfaction"; on 69 it did not matter anymore and the "river" could flow without restriction...
Gross? (well, since 50% folks would yell YES, but 50% would keep mouth shut... Well, well, it is a matter for another place and hoour, isn´t it?).
Anyway, I think "Let it Bleed" marks the end of a circle (yes, I know it is a math/geometric nonsense, but it a metaphor) which starts on
"repression" (old ways) and ends on "liberation" (new ways).
(And if those three years was a time when the world (the old world of our granparents) was "ruining, burning, being broked for these hairy and dirty boys", I think it is not a simple coincidence.)
I mean, this song is the end of "teenage years" of RS: their next albuns (Sticky Fingers and Exile on Main Street) is much more "adults", musical and  lyrically. 
So, before the 66 dilemma, now this poor bay decides to accept the terms for obtain his "satisfaction" (in this case, of course, Mick is among those 50% who remains in silent agreement...)

This is why I think this music is superb: it brings an answer to a very difficult question: to grow up or not to grow up.
Is this the right answer?

Hey, it is just a music...
And for music (and art) any answer is better no answer at all.
 
Dog pile. WTF ARE you talking about?
Posted 11 years ago by DD gypsyman    [ Reply ]
 thais wrote:

On 1966 Mick sings (and complains):

"and I'm tryin' to make some girl
who tells me a baby better come back a maybe next week
'cause you see I'm on losing streak.
I can't get no, oh no no no."

On 1969 Mick sings (and does not complain):

"Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, and if you want it, baby, well you can bleed on me
Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, yeah, and if you want it, baby, why don'cha bleed on me"

Is there a "blood pact" link?
I mean: on 66 all this poor boy could get was go back to home (or pub) with "no satisfaction"; on 69 it did not matter anymore and the "river" could flow without restriction...
Gross? (well, since 50% folks would yell YES, but 50% would keep mouth shut... Well, well, it is a matter for another place and hoour, isn´t it?).
Anyway, I think "Let it Bleed" marks the end of a circle (yes, I know it is a math/geometric nonsense, but it a metaphor) which starts on
"repression" (old ways) and ends on "liberation" (new ways).
(And if those three years was a time when the world (the old world of our granparents) was "ruining, burning, being broked for these hairy and dirty boys", I think it is not a simple coincidence.)
I mean, this song is the end of "teenage years" of RS: their next albuns (Sticky Fingers and Exile on Main Street) is much more "adults", musical and  lyrically. 
So, before the 66 dilemma, now this poor bay decides to accept the terms for obtain his "satisfaction" (in this case, of course, Mick is among those 50% who remains in silent agreement...)

This is why I think this music is superb: it brings an answer to a very difficult question: to grow up or not to grow up.
Is this the right answer?

Hey, it is just a music...
And for music (and art) any answer is better no answer at all.
 
huh?
Posted 12 years ago by Proclivities    [ Reply ]
 Proclivities wrote:


I don't believe Taylor is playing on this tune.  He was a great addition, though.
 
huh how about that. I went snooped around and you are right. Apparently he only plays on Country Honk and Live with me. Richards get the credit for all the guitar playing. Learn something new everyday!
Posted 12 years ago by martinc    [ Reply ]
 thais wrote:

On 1966 Mick sings (and complains):

"and I'm tryin' to make some girl
who tells me a baby better come back a maybe next week
'cause you see I'm on losing streak.
I can't get no, oh no no no."

On 1969 Mick sings (and does not complain):

"Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, and if you want it, baby, well you can bleed on me
Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, yeah, and if you want it, baby, why don'cha bleed on me"

Is there a "blood pact" link?
I mean: on 66 all this poor boy could get was go back to home (or pub) with "no satisfaction"; on 69 it did not matter anymore and the "river" could flow without restriction...
Gross? (well, since 50% folks would yell YES, but 50% would keep mouth shut... Well, well, it is a matter for another place and hoour, isn´t it?).
Anyway, I think "Let it Bleed" marks the end of a circle (yes, I know it is a math/geometric nonsense, but it a metaphor) which starts on
"repression" (old ways) and ends on "liberation" (new ways).
(And if those three years was a time when the world (the old world of our granparents) was "ruining, burning, being broked for these hairy and dirty boys", I think it is not a simple coincidence.)
I mean, this song is the end of "teenage years" of RS: their next albuns (Sticky Fingers and Exile on Main Street) is much more "adults", musical and  lyrically. 
So, before the 66 dilemma, now this poor bay decides to accept the terms for obtain his "satisfaction" (in this case, of course, Mick is among those 50% who remains in silent agreement...)

This is why I think this music is superb: it brings an answer to a very difficult question: to grow up or not to grow up.
Is this the right answer?

Hey, it is just a music...
And for music (and art) any answer is better no answer at all.
 
What the...?

How dare you taint my birthday with such...well, poor spelling and grammar, for starters!  :-)

I believe you've also misquoted the lyrics somewhat, thais.
Now, I can appreciate that, apparently, English is not your first tongue. I am envious of you to have this much command of another language, if this is the case. You put me to shame on that count. However, I fail to see the point you're trying to make, friend.
Posted 12 years ago by meinthecorner    [ Reply ]

On 1966 Mick sings (and complains):

"and I'm tryin' to make some girl
who tells me a baby better come back a maybe next week
'cause you see I'm on losing streak.
I can't get no, oh no no no."

On 1969 Mick sings (and does not complain):

"Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, and if you want it, baby, well you can bleed on me
Yeah, we all need someone we can bleed on
Yeah, yeah, and if you want it, baby, why don'cha bleed on me"

Is there a "blood pact" link?
I mean: on 66 all this poor boy could get was go back to home (or pub) with "no satisfaction"; on 69 it did not matter anymore and the "river" could flow without restriction...
Gross? (well, since 50% folks would yell YES, but 50% would keep mouth shut... Well, well, it is a matter for another place and hoour, isn´t it?).
Anyway, I think "Let it Bleed" marks the end of a circle (yes, I know it is a math/geometric nonsense, but it a metaphor) which starts on
"repression" (old ways) and ends on "liberation" (new ways).
(And if those three years was a time when the world (the old world of our granparents) was "ruining, burning, being broked for these hairy and dirty boys", I think it is not a simple coincidence.)
I mean, this song is the end of "teenage years" of RS: their next albuns (Sticky Fingers and Exile on Main Street) is much more "adults", musical and  lyrically. 
So, before the 66 dilemma, now this poor bay decides to accept the terms for obtain his "satisfaction" (in this case, of course, Mick is among those 50% who remains in silent agreement...)

This is why I think this music is superb: it brings an answer to a very difficult question: to grow up or not to grow up.
Is this the right answer?

Hey, it is just a music...
And for music (and art) any answer is better no answer at all.


Posted 12 years ago by thais    [ Reply ]
 martinc wrote:
One of the band's best. Mick Taylor was a great addition.
 

I don't believe Taylor is playing on this tune.  He was a great addition, though.
Posted 12 years ago by Proclivities    [ Reply ]
Thanks for the sunshine, Bill. Should have trusted you from the start.
Posted 13 years ago by Sasha2001    [ Reply ]
Yet another great song from a terrific album.  The Stones were on a roll during this period.
Posted 13 years ago by bachbeet    [ Reply ]
 Wizzuvvoz wrote:
Mick with an "American" accent makes about as much sense to me as somebody like John Fogarty singing with a British accent.
 
I understand your point, but Fogarty's "bayou" accent somehow came from growing up in El Cerrito, California.

I think it's more about your musical influences than it is where you were born. While I was born in the USA, my singing voice sounds more like a Canadian goose. 
Posted 13 years ago by rcurrier    [ Reply ]
 toterola wrote:
16 people rated this song a "1". How is this possible? {#Stupid}
 

Beats the shit outta me, this song is great man!{#Notworthy}
Posted 13 years ago by sirdroseph    [ Reply ]
 toterola wrote:
16 people rated this song a "1". How is this possible? {#Stupid}
 
My guess is that they're hemophobes. Either that or creamophobes.
Posted 13 years ago by Otomi    [ Reply ]
ALL OVER....Wooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!
 
Posted 13 years ago by Jelani    [ Reply ]
16 people rated this song a "1". How is this possible? {#Stupid}


Posted 13 years ago by toterola    [ Reply ]
that is some killer slide guitar
Posted 13 years ago by fatcatjb    [ Reply ]
 robd708 wrote:
No more stones.  Overplayed, undertalented.
 
I really wonder what your definition of talented is {#Eh}
Posted 13 years ago by themarty    [ Reply ]
{#Skull} ziakut wrote:
Not anymore...the songs over. :)  {#Lol} sirdroseph wrote:


That's your problem! Great song!!{#Bananajam}
 
 


Posted 14 years ago by cohifi    [ Reply ]
 robd708 wrote:
No more stones.  Overplayed, undertalented.
 
Glad others are enjoying it, but I am with you. This song has always irritated me.
Posted 14 years ago by curufinwe    [ Reply ]
No more stones.  Overplayed, undertalented.
Posted 14 years ago by robd708    [ Reply ]
Not anymore...the songs over. :)  {#Lol} sirdroseph wrote:


That's your problem! Great song!!{#Bananajam}
 


Posted 14 years ago by ziakut    [ Reply ]
From an 8 > 9.  Will probably become a 10 the next time this rolls around.
Posted 14 years ago by BKardon    [ Reply ]
GREAT...GREAT...GREAT
Posted 14 years ago by dakine1972    [ Reply ]
 ziakut wrote:
Thumbs down to the most over rated band on the planet. Right place, right time...is a good phrase for these guys. Sure...a few tunes I kinda like by them...but sloppiness and mediocrity just doesn't appeal to me and never has.
 

That's your problem! Great song!!{#Bananajam}
Posted 14 years ago by sirdroseph    [ Reply ]
Thumbs down to the most over rated band on the planet. Right place, right time...is a good phrase for these guys. Sure...a few tunes I kinda like by them...but sloppiness and mediocrity just doesn't appeal to me and never has.
Posted 14 years ago by ziakut    [ Reply ]
 ick wrote:
These guys suck, they'll never make it big.
 
That's some funny shit, yo!
Almost spit my coffee onto the keyboard. 
Posted 14 years ago by Jelani    [ Reply ]
Am I wrong, but this is the edited version, isn't it?  Somewhere in the beginning, there's a line with a 2 syllable (sp?) word, chopped and replaced with "coke"...
Posted 14 years ago by Gatlinburger    [ Reply ]
These guys suck, they'll never make it big.
Posted 15 years ago by ick    [ Reply ]
 Misterfixit wrote:
He sings: " ... if you want to, you can cream on me ..." a polite rendition of Bukkake, I suppose. Ewwww, TMI
 
Hey, I learned a new word today! Thanks, Misterfixit!

Posted 15 years ago by jpgr69    [ Reply ]
A great song but bad medical advice.
Posted 15 years ago by peter_james_bond    [ Reply ]
One of the band's best. Mick Taylor was a great addition.
Posted 15 years ago by martinc    [ Reply ]
This song always makes me want to listen to something off of the Faces' Long Player.  It's got that same laid-back feel to it.
Posted 16 years ago by ReVeRb1080    [ Reply ]
That's some segue!  What are we to think?  Is Bill's response to the negativity about Dengue Fever (the band) to just 'Let It Bleed'?
{#Ask}

Posted 16 years ago by macadavy    [ Reply ]
physicsgenius wrote:
Next time you feel compelled to listen to a song by the Rolling Stones, listen to silence for the same length of time instead. At the end, notice how much happier you are with your new choice.
I'm going to try a variation on this suggestion. Next time, instead of reading a comment by physicsgenius, I'm just going to stare off in to space for a minute or so. And I'll bet I will be happier with that choice.
Posted 16 years ago by cosmiclint    [ Reply ]
This album is consistently good from start to finish. A true classic.
Posted 16 years ago by jpgr69    [ Reply ]
Many Stones songs I feel are just overplayed. However, this song is great always!
Posted 16 years ago by Jack_Straw    [ Reply ]
When they sing these songs live now it's just sleazy...and I hear they all bathe in brine.
Posted 16 years ago by EssexTex    [ Reply ]
Still a good tune!
Posted 16 years ago by pushkinjim    [ Reply ]
Mick and Keith were naughty boys then .... and still are occasionally these days even. That explains the lyrics - while the Beatles were asking to hold your hand, the Stones were just asking for your hand .... and don't ask what they wanted it for.
Nobody is seriously rocking out to the Stones. They are remembering all the great times they had smoking joints or hanging out in pool halls or marching in protests or whatever Stones fans did 40 years ago.
Thanks for letting me know what I was thinking .... what a fool I've been!
Posted 16 years ago by riffster    [ Reply ]
once again I find myself interested in something more than the stones... oooo! Rugby 101! bye!
Posted 16 years ago by Rendergirl    [ Reply ]
Mick with an "American" accent makes about as much sense to me as somebody like John Fogarty singing with a British accent.
Posted 16 years ago by Wizzuvvoz    [ Reply ]
And i like it, like it, like it... :-) Mick... from France !
Posted 17 years ago by Mick55    [ Reply ]
When I find myself in times of trouble, mother Mary comes to me, speaking words of wisdom, let it bleed
Posted 17 years ago by RockinBlueVoodoo    [ Reply ]
go_ski_mully wrote:
What does Mick mean when he says "...and if you want to honey, you can cream on me"?
Hmmm, check out the lyrics to Liz Phair's "HWC". Some variation of that, I'm guessing.
Posted 17 years ago by On_The_Beach    [ Reply ]
go_ski_mully wrote:
What does Mick mean when he says "...and if you want to honey, you can cream on me"?
He sings: " ... if you want to, you can cream on me ..." a polite rendition of Bukkake, I suppose. Ewwww, TMI
Posted 17 years ago by Misterfixit    [ Reply ]
I was not alive when this song came out but when I hear it I TURN. IT. UP.
Posted 17 years ago by DoctorHooey    [ Reply ]
Not my favourite Stones' song, I'm afraid. Only a 5 from me.
Posted 17 years ago by canadave    [ Reply ]
eastcoast wrote:
I like Hendrix and I was not alive then...
I guess this argument is wasted on me...I was alive to hear this music the first time around...and yes, still love it.
Posted 17 years ago by redtex    [ Reply ]
Almo80 wrote:
I like the Stones....but all their songs sound the same!
Take the earplugs out.
Posted 17 years ago by queenjill    [ Reply ]
Thats the funniest thing I have ever heard. Almo80 wrote:
I like the Stones....but all their songs sound the same!
Posted 17 years ago by eastcoast    [ Reply ]
ODDS ARE AGAINST PG being in th ethereal 2%. I personally think he/she/it may be a seriously lonely and pathetic person (gee-wonder why?!?!?!?) who is in dire straits for some compassion, unconditional love & tolerance. PG - if you want, you can lean on me brutha. LIKE THE SONG SAYS. Or am I NOT permitted to proffer that since it is nolonger the 60's/70's ?!?
Posted 17 years ago by buckskin    [ Reply ]
I like Hendrix and I was not alive then...does this mean hendrix is crap? Just curious. physicsgenius wrote:
I can understand why someone in the 60s (or even 70s) might think the Stones were good--there wasn't all that much else to compare them with. But it is now time to Let. It. Go. Next time you feel compelled to listen to a song by the Rolling Stones, listen to silence for the same length of time instead. At the end, notice how much happier you are with your new choice.
Posted 17 years ago by eastcoast    [ Reply ]
11. definitely!
Posted 17 years ago by driver8    [ Reply ]
Johnny Winter does an absolutely amazing version of this song that just flat out cooks. I uploaded it to RP but it was turned down.. Too bad, it would have made an excellent addition to the playlist in the vein of say SRV or Hendrix..
Posted 17 years ago by healyf52    [ Reply ]
I like the Stones....but all their songs sound the same!
Posted 17 years ago by Almo80    [ Reply ]
Outstanding...Stones at the Height of their carreer which fortunately lasted for quite a few albums.
Posted 17 years ago by eastcoast    [ Reply ]
physicsgenius wrote:
Yes, exactly my point. If you have to have been alive at the time it came out to appreciate something, it is crap. It has no lasting power. It is nostalgia rock only. Nobody is seriously rocking out to the Stones. They are remembering all the great times they had smoking joints or hanging out in pool halls or marching in protests or whatever Stones fans did 40 years ago.
I can see your point that the inherent "greatness" of a song is limited if the only way to for anyone to appreciate is to associate it with contemporary memories. But you've taken a good way for an individual to do an internal inventory for him/herself and tried to make it an automatic rule to disqualify the Stones completely as a band worth listening to today. People do still "seriously rock" out to the Stones music of the 60s and 70s. Maybe you and I and have different ideas as to what "seriously rock" means, but I know people of all ages who still enjoy their music from this period. "I can understand why someone in the 60s (or even 70s) might think the Stones were good--there wasn't all that much else to compare them with. But it is now time to Let. It. Go." Such crap. The band released a lot of mediocre songs to fill out albums, but with their best stuff they stand the test of time. Should we trash The Who as well? Remember that two hit TV shows in the US use Who songs in the opening credits. I would dearly love to see what you "seriously rock out" to. I'm sure some of it dates back to the 60s and 70s and would qualify in the minds of many younger listeners as only nostalgia rock. But if it grabs you, who cares, even if it is only nostalgia rock? If the Stones from the 60s and 70s still thrills people, who cares? Who made you God to determine how and why music should move people?
Posted 17 years ago by kcar    [ Reply ]
blueyedmerle wrote:
Somebody answer the poor soul.
Young man, we're not talking about Ginger Baker or Eric Clapton here...
Posted 17 years ago by Panama_Floyd    [ Reply ]
Waybo wrote:
Love this song. Probably my favorite Stones album.
One of the Stones' worst renditions of a song so overplayed that I cannot tell which level of poor I would place it in.
Posted 17 years ago by rKokon    [ Reply ]
Love this song. Probably my favorite Stones album.
Posted 17 years ago by Waybo    [ Reply ]