M.A.G.A. - R_P - Jun 22, 2018 - 11:01pm
 
Name My Band - R_P - Jun 22, 2018 - 10:47pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos; Please Limit to 510 ... - fractalv - Jun 22, 2018 - 9:50pm
 
illegal immigrants - kurtster - Jun 22, 2018 - 9:42pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Jun 22, 2018 - 9:25pm
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Jun 22, 2018 - 8:29pm
 
Regarding cats - BlueHeronDruid - Jun 22, 2018 - 8:11pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Jun 22, 2018 - 8:04pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Jun 22, 2018 - 7:41pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Jun 22, 2018 - 7:28pm
 
Trump - R_P - Jun 22, 2018 - 6:20pm
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - Steely_D - Jun 22, 2018 - 6:08pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - Jun 22, 2018 - 2:40pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - 10180171 - Jun 22, 2018 - 1:59pm
 
What Makes You Cry :) ? - BlueHeronDruid - Jun 22, 2018 - 1:57pm
 
Great guitar faces - 10180171 - Jun 22, 2018 - 1:50pm
 
The Obituary Page - R_P - Jun 22, 2018 - 1:34pm
 
HomeKit HomePod AppleTV - Richard_Vignola - Jun 22, 2018 - 1:33pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - PoundPuppy - Jun 22, 2018 - 11:59am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - PoundPuppy - Jun 22, 2018 - 11:49am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - SeriousLee - Jun 22, 2018 - 10:38am
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - Steely_D - Jun 22, 2018 - 9:47am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Jun 22, 2018 - 9:25am
 
THE Question of Our Time - Red_Dragon - Jun 22, 2018 - 8:36am
 
Happy Solstice - oldviolin - Jun 22, 2018 - 8:24am
 
Old Time and Folk - rhahl - Jun 22, 2018 - 8:08am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jun 22, 2018 - 7:45am
 
Amazon Products (May Contain Spam) - Proclivities - Jun 22, 2018 - 6:48am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Proclivities - Jun 22, 2018 - 6:41am
 
New Music - sirdroseph - Jun 22, 2018 - 6:41am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Proclivities - Jun 22, 2018 - 6:35am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - triskele - Jun 21, 2018 - 7:45pm
 
What makes you smile? - Antigone - Jun 21, 2018 - 4:45pm
 
Best Song Comments. - ptooey - Jun 21, 2018 - 2:26pm
 
Free Stuff & Swap - R_P - Jun 21, 2018 - 1:20pm
 
Middle-aged white Americans face declining life expectancy - R_P - Jun 21, 2018 - 1:10pm
 
Football, soccer, futbol, calcio... - aflanigan - Jun 21, 2018 - 12:40pm
 
Hockey + Fantasy Hockey - maryte - Jun 21, 2018 - 12:06pm
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - SeriousLee - Jun 21, 2018 - 11:14am
 
Things that piss me off - spammer - Jun 21, 2018 - 10:19am
 
Advice? - Proclivities - Jun 21, 2018 - 10:11am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 21, 2018 - 9:10am
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - sirdroseph - Jun 21, 2018 - 1:36am
 
RP3 Beta Player - dlaumor - Jun 21, 2018 - 1:32am
 
World Music - R_P - Jun 20, 2018 - 8:34pm
 
Canada - jambo - Jun 20, 2018 - 7:07pm
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Jun 20, 2018 - 6:45pm
 
You might be getting old if...... - Coaxial - Jun 20, 2018 - 5:26pm
 
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum - JrzyTmata - Jun 20, 2018 - 3:13pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 20, 2018 - 1:09pm
 
Progressive rock at morow.com - westslope - Jun 20, 2018 - 12:50pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Jun 20, 2018 - 11:58am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Jun 20, 2018 - 10:09am
 
OUR CATS!! - Coaxial - Jun 20, 2018 - 6:02am
 
Play the Blues - rhahl - Jun 20, 2018 - 4:59am
 
Guns - R_P - Jun 19, 2018 - 5:26pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - R_P - Jun 19, 2018 - 5:20pm
 
Unattractive celebrities you'd date - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 19, 2018 - 4:29pm
 
Answers Only - aflanigan - Jun 19, 2018 - 3:11pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - Kev__P - Jun 19, 2018 - 2:01pm
 
Apple Watch Funtionality - pjjameso - Jun 19, 2018 - 1:43pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - Proclivities - Jun 19, 2018 - 10:51am
 
Even In The Quietest Moments - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 19, 2018 - 9:01am
 
Economix - R_P - Jun 18, 2018 - 11:38pm
 
Beer - Blackbirds - Jun 18, 2018 - 10:48pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jun 18, 2018 - 7:58pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - kurtster - Jun 18, 2018 - 5:48pm
 
Voter Registration Fraud - R_P - Jun 18, 2018 - 5:20pm
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 18, 2018 - 11:35am
 
Back to the 30's - R_P - Jun 17, 2018 - 4:37pm
 
Back to the 70's - R_P - Jun 17, 2018 - 2:33pm
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Jun 17, 2018 - 8:51am
 
Cannot login with Android app - tortdog - Jun 17, 2018 - 6:06am
 
Google Home - jarro - Jun 17, 2018 - 1:38am
 
Celebrity Deaths - islander - Jun 16, 2018 - 1:40pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22  Next
Post to this Topic
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 13, 2018 - 7:25am

How We Screwed Up Nuclear Power

Half a century ago, nuclear power was on track to out-compete fossil fuels around the globe, which would have reduced the price of electricity, the amount of harmful air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions associated with climate change. Then came a dramatic slowing of new construction and research into safer and more efficient nuclear reactors.

According to Australian National University researcher Peter Lang, the '60s and '70s saw a transition "from rapidly falling costs and accelerating deployment to rapidly rising costs and stalled deployment." Had the initial trajectory continued, he writes in the journal Energies, nuclear-generated electricity would now be around 10 percent of its current cost.

In a counterfactual scenario featuring increasing uptake of nuclear power from 1976, Lang calculates that by 2015 it would have replaced all coal-burning and three-quarters of gas-fired electric power generation. Thus, over the past 30 years we could have substituted 186,000 terawatt-hours of electricity production, avoiding up to 174 gigatons of carbon dioxide emissions and 9.5 million air pollution deaths. Cumulative global carbon dioxide emissions would be about 18 percent lower, and annual global carbon dioxide emissions would be one-third less.


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 16, 2018 - 7:14am

 haresfur wrote:

It was a mistake for Carter to cancel the reprocessing program and mixed fuel reactors. I think it is a laugh when people complain about using plutonium in reactors when power reactors are getting about 1/3 of their energy from the plutonium produced by the time they need refueling. But the waste problem isn't the plutonium, although that is what scares people. The real issue is the long-lived fission products like technetium-99 and I-129. You still have to deal with those and reprocessing mobilizes them. There is a pretty good iodine plume from the British reprocessing plant.

I don't have an opinion on Thorium reactors. In the early days, the Hanford site played around with thorium in the K reactors by using it in the outside core tubes. You get a different suite of fission products but nothing that will go boom. I forget the details and my chart of the nuclides is at work.

 
this may offer some info/insight on the subject

sorenson has a loner more detailed google talk about the waste issue

one of the freaky things about this video is around the 13.39 mark george lucas of star wars fame strolls up behind the interview and nobody really notices or cares
{#Lol}



haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 16, 2018 - 6:24am

 miamizsun wrote:


i agree with teac and pro-nuclear scientists and engineers that the politics around nuclear energy have been misrepresented and/or misinterpreted 

broadly speaking old tech was geared toward making stuff that goes boom (see oak ridge) and people should be cautious about weaponizing anything

when designed primarily for energy production the waste and the risk are greatly reduced (in fact we can burn the old waste for energy)

obviously coal and fossil fuels are sun-setting tech and solar and wind are intermittent and usually require storage and back up sources of energy

i encourage folks to investigate and thanks for the support
 {#Cheers}
 
It was a mistake for Carter to cancel the reprocessing program and mixed fuel reactors. I think it is a laugh when people complain about using plutonium in reactors when power reactors are getting about 1/3 of their energy from the plutonium produced by the time they need refueling. But the waste problem isn't the plutonium, although that is what scares people. The real issue is the long-lived fission products like technetium-99 and I-129. You still have to deal with those and reprocessing mobilizes them. There is a pretty good iodine plume from the British reprocessing plant.

I don't have an opinion on Thorium reactors. In the early days, the Hanford site played around with thorium in the K reactors by using it in the outside core tubes. You get a different suite of fission products but nothing that will go boom. I forget the details and my chart of the nuclides is at work.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 16, 2018 - 5:15am

 haresfur wrote:
I know a bit about nuke stuff and tend to agree with you, at least in the mid-term timescale, but not because I'm wild about the risks or dealing with the waste.

Mainly I'm anti-coal and I reckon that if people want the energy they should be willing to assume the risks of nuclear rather than the known damage from coal mining and coal emissions.
 

i agree with teac and pro-nuclear scientists and engineers that the politics around nuclear energy have been misrepresented and/or misinterpreted 

broadly speaking old tech was geared toward making stuff that goes boom (see oak ridge) and people should be cautious about weaponizing anything

when designed primarily for energy production the waste and the risk are greatly reduced (in fact we can burn the old waste for energy)

obviously coal and fossil fuels are sun-setting tech and solar and wind are intermittent and usually require storage and back up sources of energy

i encourage folks to investigate and thanks for the support


 {#Cheers}

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 16, 2018 - 3:55am

 katzendogs wrote:
I had a  job here once.  


Just an FYI. {#Lol}
I rented a trailer in Joshua. The trailer (ina park) was backed up to a small ranch(ito) and was quiet and like in the middle of nowhere. This is where I found my first Walmart. Bought everthing I could get with my first paycheck. i bought the hottest friffin type of sleeping bag ever, not knowing all those ratings they have. (i'm in texas).

But i had a cow. I called her 96. Because of the tag in her ear. She and I would sometimes 'holla' at each other ! {#Lol} 
I would throw scraps at her at times. some beef even. Some eggshells. she was a crazy old friend from those few months.

 

some of us have had "kerouac moments" in our lives

mine wasn't as sexy as yours

{#Wink}
haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 15, 2018 - 5:34pm

 miamizsun wrote:

i like the energy and i still think nuclear is the way to go

in the mean time i say build a lot of smaller reactors with the tech we have

scatter them where we need to

you know, to hold us over until this cake is baked
 
I know a bit about nuke stuff and tend to agree with you, at least in the mid-term timescale, but not because I'm wild about the risks or dealing with the waste.

Mainly I'm anti-coal and I reckon that if people want the energy they should be willing to assume the risks of nuclear rather than the known damage from coal mining and coal emissions.
katzendogs

katzendogs Avatar

Location: Pasadena ,Texas
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Mar 15, 2018 - 5:12pm

I had a  job here once.  


Just an FYI. {#Lol}
I rented a trailer in Joshua. The trailer (ina park) was backed up to a small ranch(ito) and was quiet and like in the middle of nowhere. This is where I found my first Walmart. Bought everthing I could get with my first paycheck. i bought the hottest friffin type of sleeping bag ever, not knowing all those ratings they have. (i'm in texas).

But i had a cow. I called her 96. Because of the tag in her ear. She and I would sometimes 'holla' at each other ! {#Lol} 
I would throw scraps at her at times. some beef even. Some eggshells. she was a crazy old friend from those few months.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 15, 2018 - 3:41pm




flan, that's actually funny  {#Arrowd}
aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Mar 9, 2018 - 2:00pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:

I think energy should be decentralized - every home should have it's own reactor.

 
Slippery slope my friend. With our luck, Trump will agree to share nuclear weapons technology with North Korea when he meets Kim Jong Un, in return for hair grooming secrets.

Next thing you know Suburban Americans will be using superior North Korean weapons technology to employ their reactors to construct tactical weapons.


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 9, 2018 - 1:53pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:
I think energy should be decentralized - every home should have it's own reactor.
 

easy

next thing you know you'll ask for running water and indoor plumbing



Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Mar 9, 2018 - 1:43pm

 miamizsun wrote:

i like the energy and i still think nuclear is the way to go

in the mean time i say build a lot of smaller reactors with the tech we have

scatter them where we need to

you know, to hold us over until this cake is baked
 
I think energy should be decentralized - every home should have it's own reactor.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 9, 2018 - 1:40pm

 aflanigan wrote:
Whose goose are you fixing to cook now??{#Wink}
 
damned if i know

but i did get this from my subscription this morning

it looks like canada and the states are finally going forward with this

le blanc says the we'll see it in the 2020s (canada first)

probably sooner rather than later (he doesn't want to speak for the regulators)

and by sooner i mean four to six years (i think i remember gleaning that from other material)

once they get that IMSR grill fired up, I'll bring the goose



aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Mar 9, 2018 - 1:12pm

 miamizsun wrote:

you know, to hold us over until this cake is baked
 
Whose goose are you fixing to cook now??{#Wink}
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 9, 2018 - 4:50am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: 
i like the energy and i still think nuclear is the way to go

in the mean time i say build a lot of smaller reactors with the tech we have

scatter them where we need to

you know, to hold us over until this cake is baked

NoEnzLefttoSplit
Being Norwegian is over-rated.
NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male
Zodiac: Taurus
Chinese Yr: Tiger


Posted: Mar 8, 2018 - 10:44pm

Nuclear fusion on brink of being realised, say MIT scientists




miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 16, 2018 - 4:44am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: 
"what's up plasma?"

racist or not?

{#Lol}


NoEnzLefttoSplit
Being Norwegian is over-rated.
NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male
Zodiac: Taurus
Chinese Yr: Tiger


Posted: Jan 15, 2018 - 11:17am

Wendelstein progressing nicely.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 7, 2017 - 5:31am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

And I have been following it ever since! As I remember it, the difference between ITER and Wendelstein can be summarised as ITER is easier to build but makes it harder to control the plasma. The design of Wendelstein is harder to build but easier to manage the plasma. It is significant that at Wendelstein they have already moved on to working on the panels that are designed to siphon off the thermal energy and any impurities (helium ash, ash is a funny thing to call it but I guess it makes sense). So from my understanding, they have a bit of a lead over ITER, or maybe what they learn can be used in ITER when they get that far. Suddenly the time horizon doesn't look so awfully far in the future. 
't 

 
i think this touches on the differences with visuals



stay curious my friend


NoEnzLefttoSplit
Being Norwegian is over-rated.
NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male
Zodiac: Taurus
Chinese Yr: Tiger


Posted: Dec 7, 2017 - 5:21am

 miamizsun wrote:

yep

i posted something a couple of pages (and probably a couple of years) back about this

anyone can scroll and see

it's relative and lazy is correct

the visual is like a filament

here it is {#Arrowd}

i think the countdown and excitement is around the 3:40 mark  {#Lol}
 
And I have been following it ever since! As I remember it, the difference between ITER and Wendelstein can be summarised as ITER is easier to build but makes it harder to control the plasma. The design of Wendelstein is harder to build but easier to manage the plasma. It is significant that at Wendelstein they have already moved on to working on the panels that are designed to siphon off the thermal energy and any impurities (helium ash, ash is a funny thing to call it but I guess it makes sense). So from my understanding, they have a bit of a lead over ITER, or maybe what they learn can be used in ITER when they get that far. Suddenly the time horizon doesn't look so awfully far in the future. 
't 


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 7, 2017 - 5:11am

this guy has clearly explored the subject of garbage disposal reactor

as i understand it, it burns anything with a almost no waste

and the visual "stereotypical geek fashion" factor here takes the gold medal

everything else is a distant second

gotta love him tho...





Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22  Next